Compare the Apollo Light and the Inokim Quick 4 Super

It's hard to select a suitable ride considering the number of scooters out there. Among the myriad of choices, two stand out: the Apollo Light and the Inokim Quick 4 Super. Both are highly-rated electric scooters, but they offer different experiences. Starting with their motors, the Apollo Light carries a 350W engine, whereas the Inokim Quick 4 Super boasts a more powerful 600W motor. This difference significantly impacts acceleration rate and top-speed, where Quick 4 Super comes out on top due to its superior motor.

In terms of weight, the Apollo light is lighter, making it more portable than the Inokim Quick 4 Super. The Apollo Light is also known for being budget-friendly, whereas the Inokim Quick 4 Super is pricier due to its advanced features.

The maximum loading capacity, too, favors Quick 4 Super, being capable of loading up to 265 pounds as compared to Apollo Light's capacity of 220 pounds. This aspect makes Quick 4 Super more substantial for larger riders.

However, concerning the braking system, both scooters incorporate a dual braking system ensuring safety and stability during rides. Apollo Light uses mechanical brakes, while the Inokim Quick 4 Super uses the drum braking system.

Battery life is another crucial aspect where the Inokim Quick 4 Super shines with its considerable range. It outlasts the Apollo Light scooter, offering a range of up to 70 km, compared to Apollo's 35 km.

Therefore, it's clear both scooters have their strengths and weaknesses. Apollo Light excels in portability and affordability, while Inokim Quick 4 Super inclines towards speed, advanced features, and battery range. The choice largely depends on individual preference.